Quantum Physics - Future Gold Mine



Posted: Friday, September 03, 2010

by Johan Hansson
FunPhysics

Quantum physics will in the near future be an inevitable, indispensable and useful part of everyday life. It is coming, and impossible to stop. In fact, we are already there, but have yet only scratched the surface of an enormous iceberg, the majority of which is still hidden and unused. Those who do not realize this fact will be left helplessly behind. In my job I often come across people - who should know better - who believe that today's engineers just need to learn Newton 's mechanics. Talk about living in the past! 300 years, to be more exact ... Modern engineers will not be able to function on 300-year-old physics alone! We are talking about the people who will develop (the technical aspects of) our future society. Steam engines and other mechanical gadgets of the industrial revolution will never again lead to real breakthroughs that time has long since passed.

Just as the majority in the mid-1800s did not see the use of financing research in electromagnetism, the absolute "cutting-edge" fundamental research at the time, neither do the majority today understand why they should finance basic and applied research in quantum physics they simply do not see how revenues will be generated - just the same happened when Edison and others tried to introduce electric light. "People are accustomed to kerosene lamps and will never abandon them" said the critics...

Today virtually everything in society rests on the fact that we finally understood and learned how to apply electromagnetism. The "information revolution" which we now are living in the midst of (and imagine is cutting-edge-modern) is thus based on 150 years old basic research in physics.

Albert Einstein said: "You cannot solve problems at the same level of thinking that created them." Global warming, radiation risks from nuclear power and (possibly) mobile phones need entirely new techniques for their solutions - based on current (and future) fundamental research - they cannot be solved by the technology and the thinking that caused them. Perhaps an even bigger problem is that the developing countries are repeating our old mistakes, cheered on by Western corporations, using the same old technology that gave rise to the problems in the first place.

The physicist and science philosopher Thomas Kuhn coined the term "paradigm shift". Normally science develops slowly and remains within the same broad paradigms, i.e. the same framework. But sometimes revolutions happen that are impossible to arrive at gradually. Physics has undergone four really big paradigm shifts: 1. Newton 's mechanics from the 1680s. 2. Maxwell's electrodynamics from the 1860s. 3. Einstein's relativity theory of 1905 (special) and 1915 (general). 4. Quantum physics in the 1920s. These are represented in turn by: 1. Newton 's three laws of motion. 2. Maxwell's equations. 3. Einstein's equations. 4. The Schrdinger equation.

It seems that about 50 years is needed to translate revolutionary scientific discoveries into the first practical applications, and after roughly 100 years the really big money is capitalized from them: The Industrial Revolution was at its peak in the 1800s (railways, mechanical industries, etc.) and was based on Newton's equations. The Information Revolution - which we live in right now is based on Maxwell's equations. The Quantum Revolution is underway, but has barely started.

For a very long time to come, all pioneering applications (medicine, computers, communication, and every other "micro-engineering") will be based on quantum physics.

AND the Bill Gates of the new era will be a quantum engineer!

Forwarding of this publication is allowed provided the following web address is included www.FunPhysics.org

FunPhysics.org is a resource for everything on physics, astronomy and the universe, featuring physics researcher, Prof. Johan Hansson - among many other things the discoverer of Preon Stars, as covered in e.g. Nature and Physical Review Focus

Prof. Johan Hansson is a researcher and PhD in theoretical physics, active both in the USA and Europe. He is, among many other things, the discoverer of Preon Stars, as covered in e.g. Nature and Physical Review Focus.

This Article has been viewed 259 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
No comments yet.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.